Saturday, November 7, 2009

"Battle of Wanat" VS. "Fort Hood Attack"

The "Battle of Wanat" occurred on July 13, 2008 when approximately 200 Taliban guerrillas ... surrounded the remote [US] base and its observation post and attacked it from both the village and the surrounding farmland. They destroyed much of the Americans heavy munitions and even broke through the American lines entering the main base...

The attack... began at approximately 4:20 a.m. Taliban forces fired on the base from the village using machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades, and mortars, exploiting homes, a bazaar, and a mosque in the village as cover. Another 100 militants attacked the observation post from farmland to the east...

US Casualties: 9 servicemen were killed and 27 wounded.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Wanat

____


The "Fort Hood attack" occurred on November 5, 2009 at approximately 1:30 pm Central Time when 1 (one) jihadist attacked largest United States military installations in the world.

US Casualties: 13 killed and 38 wounded.

___

















________

Sunday, October 4, 2009

10 Richest Members of Congress

Rank Member Assets Liabilities 2008 Minimum

Net Worth (MNW)

Party
1 John Kerry (Mass.) $215.41 $47.86 $167.55 Democrat
2 Darrell Issa (Calif.) 164.70 0.00 164.70 Republican
3 Jane Harman (Calif.) 112.13 0.00 112.13 Democrat
4 Jay Rockefeller (W.Va.) 85.70 5.25 80.45 Democrat
5 Mark Warner (Va.) 75.77 3.40 72.37 Democrat
6 Jared Polis (Colo.) 76.14 5.14 71.00 Democrat
7 Vern Buchanan (Fla.) 85.39 35.60 49.79 Republican
8 Frank Lautenberg (N.J.) 48.88 0.50 48.38 Democrat
9 Dianne Feinstein (Calif.) 43.94 1.00 42.94 Democrat
10 Harry Teague (N.M.) 41.63 1.00 40.63 Democrat

*/ Assets, liabilities, net worth and difference figures in millions of dollars.

Data Source: Roll Call, 2009

___

See also for comparison the data of 2005:

The 10 Richest Members of Congress

    1. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.)
    2. Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.)
    3. Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.)
    4. Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.)
    5. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.)
    6. Rep. Robin Hayes (R-N.C.) -
    7. Rep. Charles Taylor (R-N.C.)
    8. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)
    9. Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-R.I.)
    10. Sen. John McCain (R-Ari

The 4 out of 5 richest members of Congress in both Lists are the members of Democratic party.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

How Republican and Democratic Voters Differ in Their Education

One of the most popular myth is ... "the more educated voters are, the more probability exist they will vote for progressive liberal candidate". The myth -- by definition -- can't be broken by the facts, but we will try any way:

National Survey of Likely Voters Conducted March 30-April 5, 2009

Rasmussen Reports Education
March 30 - April 5, 2009 Not sure Attend HS HS Grad Some College College Grad Grad School
Republican Voters 17% 23% 37% 42% 45% 34%
Democratic Voters 51% 63% 43% 38% 32% 45%

Data source: By Rasmussen Reports
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/april_2009/crosstabs_full_week_march_30_april_5_2009
_________

CNN Exit Poll President Election November 2008

http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/CNN_08.jpg

____


Gallup Poll: July 2008

http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/gallup_July09_2.gif



http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/gallup_July09.gif


Editor in Chief Gallup Poll Frank Newport comment: The overall pattern of the vote by education this summer is roughly consistent with that of the last election in 2004, although the margins within each group vary across elections. In 2004, Gallup's final analysis of the vote showed John Kerry winning among voters with high school educations or less, and winning among those with postgraduate education -- similar to Obama's edge in these groups today [2008]. Bush won among those with college degrees (but no postgraduate education) in 2004, as does McCain today (but by a slimmer margin).

Source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/109156/Obama-Retains-Strength-Among-Highly-Educated.aspx

___

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES / NATIONAL / CNN EXIT POLL 2006

http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/CNN_06_3.jpg

__






So, generally speaking, the higher level of education voters achieved, the more probability they will vote for a Republican candidate . There is one - and one only - exclusion from this basic rule and this is the "postgrade" group of voters

The following article clarifies the main reason behind this exclusion:

College Faculties A Most Liberal Lot, Study Finds

By Howard Kurtz, March 29, 2005; Page C01. Washington Post

College faculties, long assumed to be a liberal bastion, lean further to the left than even the most conspiratorial conservatives might have imagined, a new study says.

By their own description, 72 percent of those teaching at American universities and colleges are liberal and 15 percent are conservative, says the study being published this week. The imbalance is almost as striking in partisan terms, with 50 percent of the faculty members surveyed identifying themselves as Democrats and 11 percent as Republicans.The disparity is even more pronounced at the most elite schools, where, according to the study, 87 percent of faculty are liberal and 13 percent are conservative.

What's most striking is how few conservatives there are in any field," said Robert Lichter, a professor at George Mason University and a co-author of the study. "There was no field we studied in which there were more conservatives than liberals or more Republicans than Democrats. It's a very homogenous environment, not just in the places you'd expect to be dominated by liberals."

Religious services take a back seat for many faculty members, with 51 percent saying they rarely or never attend church or synagogue and 31 percent calling themselves regular churchgoers. On the gender front, 72 percent of the full-time faculty are male and 28 percent female.

The findings, by Lichter and fellow political science professors Stanley Rothman of Smith College and Neil Nevitte of the University of Toronto, are based on a survey of 1,643 full-time faculty at 183 four-year schools. The researchers relied on 1999 data from the North American Academic Study Survey, the most recent comprehensive data available.

The study appears in the March issue of the Forum, an online political science journal. It was funded by the Randolph Foundation, a right-leaning group that has given grants to such conservative organizations as the Independent Women's Forum and Americans for Tax Reform.

Rothman sees the findings as evidence of "possible discrimination" against conservatives in hiring and promotion. Even after factoring in levels of achievement, as measured by published work and organization memberships, "the most likely conclusion" is that "being conservative counts against you," he said. "It doesn't surprise me, because I've observed it happening." The study, however, describes this finding as "preliminary" ...

Rothman, Lichter and Nevitte find a leftward shift on campus over the past two decades. In the last major survey of college faculty, by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching in 1984, 39 percent identified themselves as liberal.

In contrast with the finding that nearly three-quarters of college faculty are liberal, a Harris Poll of the general public last year found that 33 percent describe themselves as conservative and 18 percent as liberal.

The liberal label that a majority of the faculty members attached to themselves is reflected on a variety of issues. The professors and instructors surveyed are, strongly or somewhat, in favor of abortion rights (84 percent); believe homosexuality is acceptable (67 percent); and want more environmental protection "even if it raises prices or costs jobs" (88 percent). What's more, the study found, 65 percent want the government to ensure full employment, a stance to the left of the Democratic Party...

The researchers say that liberals, men and non-regular churchgoers are more likely to be teaching at top schools, while conservatives, women and more religious faculty are more likely to be relegated to lower-tier colleges and universities.

Top-tier schools, roughly a third of the total, are defined as highly ranked liberal arts colleges and research universities that grant PhDs.

The most liberal faculties are those devoted to the humanities (81 percent) and social sciences (75 percent), according to the study. But liberals outnumbered conservatives even among engineering faculty (51 percent to 19 percent) and business faculty (49 percent to 39 percent).

The most left-leaning departments are English literature, philosophy, political science and religious studies, where at least 80 percent of the faculty say they are liberal and no more than 5 percent call themselves conservative, the study says.

"In general," says Lichter, who also heads the nonprofit Center for Media and Public Affairs, "even broad-minded people gravitate toward other people like themselves. That's why you need diversity, not just of race and gender but also, maybe especially, of ideas and perspective."

___

During the 2008 President Election Campaign mainstream media especially often quoted the below Gallup's graphs in order to convince American people that "Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has a much greater appeal to highly educated Americans than to those with less education":




















































Nobody took attention to the "small detail" that 3 above graphs were related to the Democratic primary race and had nothing to do with "Obama Vs. MakCain" race:

http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/ObamaEduMighTable.jpg

Should US Defend the Following Countries?

Country

Ally

Enemy

U.S. Should Defend

U.S. Should Not Defend

Canada

86%

4%

78%

16%

Great Britain

85%

5%

73%

18%

Israel

70%

8%

59%

29%

Germany

66%

5%

53%

33%

France

61%

4%

45%

37%

Japan

59%

10%

46%

41%

Mexico

54%

11%

59%

28%

Egypt

39%

9%

38%

41%

Saudi Arabia

23%

25%

26%

59%

Vietnam

21%

21%

19%

64%

Data source: U.S. Standings for Various Countries Around the World. Rasmussen Report September 3-4, 2009





National Survey of 1,000 Adults Conducted September 5-6, 2009 By Rasmussen Reports

Total Gender Age Race Party Children at Home Income
Adults Men Women 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+ White Black Other Republican Democrat Other Yes No Under $20K $20K-$40K $40K-$60K $60K-$75K $75K-$100K $100K+
Should US Defend Israel With Military Aid if Attacked? Yes 59% 69% 49% 65% 49% 65% 64% 49% 62% 54% 46% 73% 47% 58% 64% 56% 48% 55% 63% 63% 62% 69%
No 29% 26% 31% 26% 36% 22% 26% 34% 27% 30% 40% 20% 36% 30% 24% 32% 36% 29% 23% 24% 31% 27%
Not sure 12% 5% 19% 9% 15% 13% 9% 17% 11% 15% 15% 7% 17% 12% 12% 12% 16% 16% 14% 13% 7% 4

Data source: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/econ_crosstabs/september_2009/crosstabs_defense_of_countries_september_3_6_2009

___

If Israel Attacked Iran the US Should...

Total

Ideology Income
Not sure Conservative Moderate Liberal Under $20K $20K-$40K $40K-$60K $60K-$75K $75K-$100K $100K+
49% Help Israel 69% 70% 42% 18% 48% 46% 52% 53% 58% 47%
2% Help Iran 0% 1% 3% 4% 4% 3% 1% 0% 0% 7%
37% Do nothing 5% 23% 45% 54% 38% 43% 37% 35% 33% 34%
11% Not sure 25% 6% 10% 23% 10% 9% 10% 12% 9% 11%

Data source: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_ content/political_tracking_crosstabs/may _2009/crosstabs_iran_israel_i_may_5_6_20 09

If Israel Attacked Iran the US Should...

Total

Gender Age Race Party
Male Female 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 65+ White Black Other Republican Democrat Other
49% Help Israel 55% 44% 33% 47% 48% 55% 52% 49% 36% 62% 64% 35% 50%
2% Help Iran 3% 2% 7% 1% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 4% 2%
37% Do nothing 35% 39% 57% 39% 35% 31% 32% 37% 50% 24% 27% 44% 39%
11% Not sure 7% 15% 4% 12% 15% 11% 14% 11% 12% 11% 7% 17% 9%

Data source: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_ content/political_tracking_crosstabs/may _2009/crosstabs_iran_israel_i_may_5_6_20 09


Why do so many Jews still vote Democrat?
American Thinker. November 03, 2008

Sometimes suicide isn't just an action, it's a choice in the back of the mind: Barack Obama wins 77 percent of Jewish vote [November 2008], exit polls show. A Gallup poll released in late October showed Jewish voters favored Barack Obama over John McCain by more than 3 to 1, with 74% saying they would vote for Obama over 22% for McCain.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Benjamin Franklin:



"When the people find they can vote themselves money,
that will herald the end of the republic."






JOHN ADAMS, President of the US 1797-1801

John Adams President

"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself.
There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide."





Friday, August 21, 2009

Congress "Healthcare Reform" debates is a "Death Panel" for Americans of all ages

Let us take a look for instance to the pair of the well known threats:

Cancer Risk for Women, US

Men Breast cancer Risk US

The current US HealthCare system constantly rises the Survival Rates:

US Cancer Survival  Rates: Breast (female), Prostate

Meanwhile the totally different situation exists in the countries, where government run the national Healthcare system. Below please compare Age-Specific Prostate Cancer Mortality Rates - Trend Comparison - "US vs. Canada", 1969-1999:

Prostate Cancer  Mortality Rate, US, Canada.

    Americans have lower cancer mortality rates than Canadians:

    - Breast cancer mortality in Canada is 9 percent higher than in the US,
    - Prostate cancer in Canada is 184 percent higher.

    Source: http://www.hoover.org/publications/digest/49525427.html

The same results of comparison can be seen for the "US vs. Europe":

    For men (all sites combined), 47.3% of Europeans survived 5 years, compared to 66.3% of Americans. For women, the contrast was 55.8% vs. 62.9%.

    The male survival difference was much greater than the female primarily because of the very large difference in survival rates from prostate cancer (see the above data).

    ... innovations in diagnosis and treatment of prostate and breast cancer were associated with faster declines in mortality in the US than in OECD (Europe) countries.

    Source: http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=psc_working_papers


http://media.gallup.com/GPTB/healthcare/20050118_3.gif
© 2006 Gallup, Inc.


    Americans have better access to important new technologies such as medical imaging than do patients in Canada or Britain.

    An overwhelming majority of leading American physicians identify computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the most important medical innovations for improving patient care during the previous decade—even as [government] economists and policy makers unfamiliar with actual medical practice decry these techniques as wasteful.

    The United States has thirty-four CT scanners per million Americans, compared to twelve in Canada and eight in Britain.

    The United States has almost twenty-seven MRI machines per million people compared to about six per million in Canada and Britain.


    Source: http://www.hoover.org/publications/digest/49525427.html

Americans have better access to important new medical technologies


See also how existing US Healthcare system is working for American children:

Children Cancer  Survival Rates, US 1975-2004

Children  Cancer  Death Rates

President Obama has pledged to get a "Healthcare reform" bill passed this year ... So, please, take a look to the above stats again and make your math - how many Americans of all age will die during next 5 years, if "Obamacare" reform will pass this year?


Some more Stats about Healthcare ...

http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/HelathCareGallup_1.jpg


http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/HelathCareGallup_2.jpg


http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/HelathCareGallup_3.jpg

Source: http://www.gallup.com/video/121940/No-Groundswell-Support-Healthcare-Reform.aspx


fuijaqwlbkekvupdi99h9w


http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/47mlnUninsuraned.jpg

hphaa4bnbucnepmtx82sfw


___

PS. The below dialogue is a fragment from WSJ discussion:

Leslie Herrick: This illustrates a fear I have regarding government run health care.

If you cannot rely on the government to apply the law towards justice, what recourse do you have when government itself makes life-and-death decisions about your health care or access to it?

And what part will your political affiliations play in the distribution of health care resources?
___

Krishnan Chittur: If Insurance companies do something egregious, you can call an attorney and see what your options are.

If (no, when) the Government does something egregious, there is nothing (absolutely nothing) you can do. They make the rules - they are players and referees all at the same time.

"Government" is made up of citizens, yes - but they are a different breed of humans - normal humans who get transformed into something unrecognizable when they grab that public power.

Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203550604574361071968458430.html#articleTabs%3Dcomments

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

How to Read and Understand the Polls:























The Gallup Polls above graph is related to Obama Job Approval by "national adults, aged 18 and older" (including illegal immigrants and other people, who do not have rights to vote).

So, it'll be interesting to compare the above Gallup data with Rasmussen Report Polls, that counts "likely voters" only:



The polls data of August 18, 2009:
- Gallup Poll Obama Job Approval / Disappoval: 52 - 42 = +10%
- Rasmussen Obama Job Approval / Disappoval: 49 -50 = - 1%

Sunday, August 16, 2009

Democrats Radically Changed Their Mind in 2008/2009

concerning the "Big Government" threat to country:

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/fy6ox3ub00qfkw93abjvlq.gif

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/s_kjaueabecbciuiyaslda.gif

Source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/117739/Big-Gov-Viewed-Greater-Threat-Big-Business.aspx




Rasmussen Government   economy
Source: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/52_worry_government_will_do_too_much_to_fix_economy

"... the Best Health Care System the World Has Ever Known"

Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) told Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday" that President Barack Obama's proposed health care plan is the "first step in destroying the best health care system the world has ever known".

Below please find some more stats in regards to the existing US Health Care System:


http://media.gallup.com/GPTB/healthcare/20050118_2.gif
© 2006 Gallup, Inc.




http://media.gallup.com/GPTB/healthcare/20050118_3.gif
© 2006 Gallup, Inc.




http://www.liberty-page.com/issues/healthcare/techgraph.gif

Rasmussen Poll Questions about the possible cost of Obama's "Healthcare Reform" can be considered as an IQ-test:

Rasmussen Poll -  expected cost of Healthcare reform - Gender, Age, Race

Rasmussen Poll -  expected cost of Healthcare reform - Gender, Age, Race


Rasmussen Poll -  expected cost of Healthcare reform - Ideology, Education


Data source: "National Survey of Likely Voters Conducted August 9-10, 2009 By Rasmussen Reports"

Obama Approval Numbers by the Demographic of Likely Voters: Gender, Age, Race, Family Status, Employment.



http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/BHO_Rating080209_3.jpg

According to the Rasmussen Poll above data:

The following groups of Likely Voters Approve of the job Barack Obama is doing as president:

- Age of 29 or younger, Women, Black, Unmarried, Do not have children at Home, Do not work for a Private Company.
___

The following groups of Likely Voters Disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president:

- Age of 30 or older, Men, White, Married, Have Children at Home, Entrepreneur, Work for a Private Company.

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Republican and Democratic Bases Differ in Education


One of the most popular myth is ... -- "the more educated voters are, the more probability exist they will vote for progressive liberal candidate". The myth -- by definition -- can't be broken by any facts of the real life, but we will try to talk about these "inconvenient facts" any way:


National Survey of Likely Voters Conducted March 30-April 5, 2009

Rasmussen Reports Education
March 30 - April 5, 2009 Not sure Attend HS HS Grad Some College College Grad Grad School
Republican Voters 17% 23% 37% 42% 45% 34%
Democratic Voters 51% 63% 43% 38% 32% 45%

Data source: By Rasmussen Reports
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/april_2009/crosstabs_full_week_march_30_april_5_2009
_________

CNN Exit Poll President Election November 2008

http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/CNN_08.jpg

____


Gallup Poll: July 2008

http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/gallup_July09_2.gif



http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/gallup_July09.gif



Editor in Chief Gallup Poll Frank Newport comment: The overall pattern of the vote by education this summer is roughly consistent with that of the last election in 2004, although the margins within each group vary across elections. In 2004, Gallup's final analysis of the vote showed John Kerry winning among voters with high school educations or less, and winning among those with postgraduate education -- similar to Obama's edge in these groups today [2008]. Bush won among those with college degrees (but no postgraduate education) in 2004, as does McCain today (but by a slimmer margin).

Source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/109156/Obama-Retains-Strength-Among-Highly-Educated.aspx

___

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES / NATIONAL / CNN EXIT POLL 2006

http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/CNN_06_3.jpg


_______

President Election November 2004






Data Source: The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ.










Fried, Joseph, Democrats and Republicans — Rhetoric and Reality (New York: Algora Publishing, 2008), 74–5.

____

So, generally speaking, the higher level of education voters achieved, the more probability they will vote for a Republican candidate .

There is one - and one only - exclusion from this basic rule, and this is the "postgrade" group of voters

The article below clarifies the main reason for this exclusion:

College Faculties A Most Liberal Lot, Study Finds

By Howard Kurtz, March 29, 2005; Page C01. Washington Post

College faculties, long assumed to be a liberal bastion, lean further to the left than even the most conspiratorial conservatives might have imagined, a new study says.

By their own description, 72 percent of those teaching at American universities and colleges are liberal and 15 percent are conservative, says the study being published this week. The imbalance is almost as striking in partisan terms, with 50 percent of the faculty members surveyed identifying themselves as Democrats and 11 percent as Republicans.The disparity is even more pronounced at the most elite schools, where, according to the study, 87 percent of faculty are liberal and 13 percent are conservative.

What's most striking is how few conservatives there are in any field," said Robert Lichter, a professor at George Mason University and a co-author of the study. "There was no field we studied in which there were more conservatives than liberals or more Republicans than Democrats. It's a very homogenous environment, not just in the places you'd expect to be dominated by liberals."

Religious services take a back seat for many faculty members, with 51 percent saying they rarely or never attend church or synagogue and 31 percent calling themselves regular churchgoers. On the gender front, 72 percent of the full-time faculty are male and 28 percent female.

The findings, by Lichter and fellow political science professors Stanley Rothman of Smith College and Neil Nevitte of the University of Toronto, are based on a survey of 1,643 full-time faculty at 183 four-year schools. The researchers relied on 1999 data from the North American Academic Study Survey, the most recent comprehensive data available.

The study appears in the March issue of the Forum, an online political science journal. It was funded by the Randolph Foundation, a right-leaning group that has given grants to such conservative organizations as the Independent Women's Forum and Americans for Tax Reform.

Rothman sees the findings as evidence of "possible discrimination" against conservatives in hiring and promotion. Even after factoring in levels of achievement, as measured by published work and organization memberships, "the most likely conclusion" is that "being conservative counts against you," he said. "It doesn't surprise me, because I've observed it happening." The study, however, describes this finding as "preliminary" ...

Rothman, Lichter and Nevitte find a leftward shift on campus over the past two decades. In the last major survey of college faculty, by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching in 1984, 39 percent identified themselves as liberal.

In contrast with the finding that nearly three-quarters of college faculty are liberal, a Harris Poll of the general public last year found that 33 percent describe themselves as conservative and 18 percent as liberal.

The liberal label that a majority of the faculty members attached to themselves is reflected on a variety of issues. The professors and instructors surveyed are, strongly or somewhat, in favor of abortion rights (84 percent); believe homosexuality is acceptable (67 percent); and want more environmental protection "even if it raises prices or costs jobs" (88 percent). What's more, the study found, 65 percent want the government to ensure full employment, a stance to the left of the Democratic Party...

The researchers say that liberals, men and non-regular churchgoers are more likely to be teaching at top schools, while conservatives, women and more religious faculty are more likely to be relegated to lower-tier colleges and universities.

Top-tier schools, roughly a third of the total, are defined as highly ranked liberal arts colleges and research universities that grant PhDs.

The most liberal faculties are those devoted to the humanities (81 percent) and social sciences (75 percent), according to the study. But liberals outnumbered conservatives even among engineering faculty (51 percent to 19 percent) and business faculty (49 percent to 39 percent).

The most left-leaning departments are English literature, philosophy, political science and religious studies, where at least 80 percent of the faculty say they are liberal and no more than 5 percent call themselves conservative, the study says.

"In general," says Lichter, who also heads the nonprofit Center for Media and Public Affairs, "even broad-minded people gravitate toward other people like themselves. That's why you need diversity, not just of race and gender but also, maybe especially, of ideas and perspective."

___

During the 2008 President Election Campaign mainstream media especially often quoted the below Gallup's graphs in order to convince American people that "Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has a much greater appeal to highly educated Americans than to those with less education":
























































Nobody took attention to the following "very small and not too important detail" -- all 3 above graphs were related to the Democratic primary race... In other words, the above graphs were about statistics related to internal competition between the Democratic candidates only.

As so, all these graphs had nothing to do with "Obama Vs. MakCain" race:



http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu3/photobucket3qo/conservative/ObamaEduMighTable.jpg

Followers